We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

4chan Rejects UK's Online Safety Act, Faces £18 million Fine

4chan Rejects UK's Online Safety Act, Faces £18 million Fine
Hendrik Human Published on August 29, 2025 Cybersecurity Researcher

The online forum 4chan has engaged legal counsel to formally reject implementing the UK’s new age verification mandates. 4chan had already announced its intention in January to refuse to comply with any form of compulsory age verification requirements for its users.

According to the new UK law, Ofcom may impose fines of up to £18 million or 10% of a company’s global annual turnover, whichever is higher. An official Ofcom notice announced the regulator’s intention to fine 4chan for failing to “comply with two statutory information requests.” Other reports indicate potential daily penalties of £20,000 for 4chan.

Ofcom also confirmed that it’s continuing to investigate the case, demanding that 4chan:

  • adequately responds to a statutory information request;
  • complete and keep a record of a suitable and sufficient illegal content risk assessment; and
  • comply with the safety duties regarding illegal content.

Delaware-based 4chan, under the leadership of Japanese owner Hiroyuki Nishimura, is one of a number of US-based companies that have approached Trump for a diplomatic solution to the standoff. Its operating entity, Community Support LLC, has retained the services of Byrne & Storm, P.C., and Ron Coleman, Coleman Law P.C., to represent 4chan in this matter.

Notorious for its free speech absolutism, 4chan has attracted numerous controversies over the years regarding the presence of problematic content on its forum. The new UK laws broadly target virtually any content deemed “harmful” or “explicit” to minors, making 4chan a prime target.

Under its Category 2B designation, 4chan’s duties under the Online Safety Act are to:

  • prevent users from encountering illegal content;
  • swiftly remove illegal content once they become aware of it;
  • use proportionate systems and processes to detect and mitigate risks of illegal content spreading.

The Online Safety Act’s new rules came into effect on 14 July, forcing numerous websites to implement “robust” age-checking methods or face serious legal consequences, including massive fines. Reddit, another popular online forum, introduced photo ID verification in order to adhere to the new regulations, as have popular sites like Pornhub, X (Twitter), Discord, and Tinder.

Ofcom’s list of “acceptable” age verification consists of highly invasive measures, such as photo ID, facial age estimation, credit card checks, and more. This has raised concerns among the public, privacy advocates, and online services about potential privacy violations. The vpnMentor’s Research Team noticed a 6,000% spike in VPN use following the Act’s rollout.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

This field must contain more than 50 characters

The field content should not exceed 1000 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Special characters are not allowed in the Name field

Please enter a valid email address