We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Google Pays $1.375 Billion in Historic Texas Privacy Settlement

Google Pays $1.375 Billion in Historic Texas Privacy Settlement
Anka Markovic Borak First published on May 14, 2025 Writer and Quality Assessor

Google has agreed to pay a record $1.375 billion to the state of Texas to resolve lawsuits accusing the tech giant of unauthorized data tracking and biometric data collection. It marks the largest privacy settlement ever obtained by a US state.

Texas’s payout surpasses all previous state-level settlements involving Google’s data privacy practices. In 2022, Google paid $391 million to 40 states in a similar multi-state action. It later reached smaller settlements with Indiana and Washington ($29.5 million) and California ($93 million).

The lawsuits, originally filed in 2022 by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, alleged that Google unlawfully tracked users' locations and collected biometric identifiers — such as facial geometry and voiceprints — without obtaining consent. The company allegedly continued monitoring user activity even when location settings were turned off, including during incognito mode sessions.

According to a second official release from Paxton’s office, Google misled users into believing they could control their personal data, while continuing to collect sensitive information in the background. The lawsuits claimed that biometric data was often gathered without users even realizing it. The case spotlighted multiple forms of invasive data collection, raising broader concerns about consumer privacy and what Paxton described as a “systemic breach of trust.”

In response to public pressure, Google announced it would now store Maps Timeline data locally on user devices instead of in the cloud. It also launched auto-delete options for location data when Location History is turned on, part of broader efforts to enhance user privacy controls.

This settlement follows a similar case involving Meta, which reportedly agreed to a $1.4 billion payout to Texas over biometric privacy violations. While Meta’s figure is numerically higher, Google's settlement is considered the largest finalized privacy settlement ever secured by a US state. Together, these cases signal growing state-level momentum to regulate Big Tech’s data collection practices more aggressively.

These high-profile settlements mark a step forward in holding companies accountable for privacy violations. But legal enforcement alone isn’t enough to guarantee user safety. Since many privacy issues are only addressed after the fact — and new tracking methods continue to emerge — users are still encouraged to take control of their personal data. That means reviewing app permissions, disabling unnecessary tracking features, and using tools like VPNs to limit online profiling.

About the Author

Anka Markovic-Borak is a writer and quality assessor at vpnMentor, who leverages her expertise to write insightful articles on cybersecurity, driven by her passion for protecting online privacy. She also ensures articles written by others are reaching vpnMentor's high standards.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

This field must contain more than 50 characters

The field content should not exceed 1000 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address